Menu

Discussion Forum

New Discussion
Filtern

Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.

Zero Determinant of stiffness matrix

Posted 11.08.2020, 10:50 GMT-4 General, LiveLink for MATLAB, Modeling Tools & Definitions Version 5.5 4 Replies

Alexandre Arsenault
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Hello,

I am trying to evaluate the conditioning of the stiffness matrix. My simulations work fine and seem to give good results. However, when I extract the stiffness matrix into Matlab using an assembly node and LiveLink, the determinant gives zero. Why does my simulation work fine, but the stiffness matrix seems non-invertible?

Thank you,

Alex

4 Replies Last Post 24.08.2020, 17:21 GMT-4
Henrik Sönnerlind COMSOL Employee

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 4 years ago 11.08.2020, 17:35 GMT-4

If you are looking at the noneliminated stiffness matrix, this is expected, but not if you are looking at the eliminated version. What type pf physics and boundary conditions are involved?

-------------------
Henrik Sönnerlind
COMSOL
If you are looking at the noneliminated stiffness matrix, this is expected, but not if you are looking at the eliminated version. What type pf physics and boundary conditions are involved?
Alexandre Arsenault
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 4 years ago 11.08.2020, 21:03 GMT-4

Hi Henrik,

Thank you for the reply. I tried looking at both the eliminated and full stiffness matrices and both give the same result.

I am using a General Form PDE that is the same physics as the MFH module to calculate the magnetic field of a superconductor. The boundary condition used is a Dirichlet condition to set the magnetic field at the domain boundary.

Cheers,

Alex

Hi Henrik, Thank you for the reply. I tried looking at both the eliminated and full stiffness matrices and both give the same result. I am using a General Form PDE that is the same physics as the MFH module to calculate the magnetic field of a superconductor. The boundary condition used is a Dirichlet condition to set the magnetic field at the domain boundary. Cheers, Alex
Henrik Sönnerlind COMSOL Employee

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 4 years ago 12.08.2020, 05:38 GMT-4

Then it difficult to guess. With sufficient Dirichlet conditions, the eliminated matrix should be nonsingular. What are the sizes of the two matrices?

-------------------
Henrik Sönnerlind
COMSOL
Then it difficult to guess. With sufficient Dirichlet conditions, the eliminated matrix should be nonsingular. What are the sizes of the two matrices?
Alexandre Arsenault
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 4 years ago 24.08.2020, 17:21 GMT-4

Hello,

It turns out that the stiffness matrix is singular in my case since we are taking the curl of the test functions in the weak formulation (not sure why this makes the matrix singular, but I read it in a few research papers). Therefore, you need to calculate the condition number of the addition of the stiffness matrix and the damping matrix in order to consider the time-dependence of the weak formulation.

Cheers,

Alex

Hello, It turns out that the stiffness matrix is singular in my case since we are taking the curl of the test functions in the weak formulation (not sure why this makes the matrix singular, but I read it in a few research papers). Therefore, you need to calculate the condition number of the addition of the stiffness matrix and the damping matrix in order to consider the time-dependence of the weak formulation. Cheers, Alex

Note that while COMSOL employees may participate in the discussion forum, COMSOL® software users who are on-subscription should submit their questions via the Support Center for a more comprehensive response from the Technical Support team.

Suggested Content