Ivar KJELBERG
COMSOL Multiphysics(r) fan, retired, former "Senior Expert" at CSEM SA (CH)
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
30.05.2012, 09:33 GMT-4
Hi
interesting, there are obviously some differences between the versions.
OK but have you tried to replace "0" in the axial direction by a "small" value, just to check it's really the anisotropy that is giving you problems and nothing else ?
--
Good luck
Ivar
Hi
interesting, there are obviously some differences between the versions.
OK but have you tried to replace "0" in the axial direction by a "small" value, just to check it's really the anisotropy that is giving you problems and nothing else ?
--
Good luck
Ivar
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
30.05.2012, 11:24 GMT-4
Hi
Its the problem only with diffusion, I think.
I tried using very small value of diffusion coefficient like 1E-9 in axial direction. But in that case also, it is showing the same error. May be because then also peclet number is so large. Galerkin FEM is unstable for peclet greater than 1.
COMSOL 4.2a is able to solve the problem if I give diffusion coefficient in the axial direction as 1E-3 times that in transverse direction, but that is a big value for my problem.
But 3.5a is not showing any error and working properly.
How can I resolve this issue in 4.2a?
Regards,
Seetha
Hi
Its the problem only with diffusion, I think.
I tried using very small value of diffusion coefficient like 1E-9 in axial direction. But in that case also, it is showing the same error. May be because then also peclet number is so large. Galerkin FEM is unstable for peclet greater than 1.
COMSOL 4.2a is able to solve the problem if I give diffusion coefficient in the axial direction as 1E-3 times that in transverse direction, but that is a big value for my problem.
But 3.5a is not showing any error and working properly.
How can I resolve this issue in 4.2a?
Regards,
Seetha
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
30.05.2012, 11:59 GMT-4
Please check the discretization and other artificial diffusion setting for variable 'conc' (convection-diffusion equation). I had similar issues, where solution for convection-diffusion equations were not matching for 3.5a (quad discretization) and 4.2 (linear discretization) version. If you make sure your discretization and other artificial diffusiuon settings are same, it should give same results. The documentation also contains more about artificial diffusion and other related settings.
Good luck.
Please check the discretization and other artificial diffusion setting for variable 'conc' (convection-diffusion equation). I had similar issues, where solution for convection-diffusion equations were not matching for 3.5a (quad discretization) and 4.2 (linear discretization) version. If you make sure your discretization and other artificial diffusiuon settings are same, it should give same results. The documentation also contains more about artificial diffusion and other related settings.
Good luck.
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
30.05.2012, 12:29 GMT-4
Hi
Thanks for your reply.
I used the same settings of 3.5a.
In 3.5a, there was no need to add artificial diffusion, as the solution was non-oscillatory.
But 4.2a is not solving at all with zero or very small diffusion coefficient. Also I am already using very fine mesh, so if peclet needs to be less than one (if I use very small diffusion coefficient), then the mesh size should be very very fine one. But I am not sure, whether the problem is due to very high peclet or something else.
Regards,
Seetha
Hi
Thanks for your reply.
I used the same settings of 3.5a.
In 3.5a, there was no need to add artificial diffusion, as the solution was non-oscillatory.
But 4.2a is not solving at all with zero or very small diffusion coefficient. Also I am already using very fine mesh, so if peclet needs to be less than one (if I use very small diffusion coefficient), then the mesh size should be very very fine one. But I am not sure, whether the problem is due to very high peclet or something else.
Regards,
Seetha