How can I get only scattered field without background field in Electromagnetic Waves, Transient

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Hello, everyone! I tried to reproduce a FDTD article in COMSOL. I would like to introduce the model briefly: I couple temw with general form PDE to describe the dynamic in material. I set a Gaussian incident pulse in SBC and make it illuminate on a metasurface.

I set a probe to get the output signal. There are two signals caused by the nonlinear PDE. I want to observe: (1) THz signal(2)400THz. I can get 400THz signal now, but I can't get THz signal. It may be covered by the background noise from Gauss pulse, and I want to eliminate it now.

However, TS/SF technique used in the FDTD article which can help them get scattered field directly without background field doesn't exist in COMSOL. And background/scattered field technique only exists in Electromagnetic Waves, Frequency domain. So what I can do in Electromagnetic Waves, Transient now?


1 Reply Last Post 24.08.2025, 22:58 MESZ
Robert Koslover Certified Consultant

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 2 hours ago 24.08.2025, 22:58 MESZ
Updated: 2 hours ago 24.08.2025, 23:03 MESZ

Although I may not fully understand your question, I will suggest a possible solution if you haven't considered it already: 1. With your model meshed exactly as before, set your material properties and interactions such that there is no scattering. Solve the problem and save the solution. This is your background field in time and space. (2) Now, set the material properties and interactions such that the wave scattering of interest to you occurs. Solve the problem again. This yields your combined scattered + background field in time and space. Subtract the first set of fields from the second set to reveal the "scattered" field components. This approach should work best (in terms of minimizing numerical noise) if you change only the material properties and interactions -- but not the actual geometry, mesh, time stepping, or discretization -- when setting up the two different configurations.

-------------------
Scientific Applications & Research Associates (SARA) Inc.
www.comsol.com/partners-consultants/certified-consultants/sara
Although I may not fully understand your question, I will suggest a possible solution if you haven't considered it already: 1. With your model meshed exactly as before, set your material properties and interactions such that there is no scattering. Solve the problem and save the solution. This is your *background field* in time and space. (2) Now, set the material properties and interactions such that the wave scattering of interest to you occurs. Solve the problem again. This yields your combined *scattered* + *background* field in time and space. Subtract the first set of fields from the second set to reveal the "scattered" field components. This approach should work best (in terms of minimizing numerical noise) if you change only the material properties and interactions -- but not the actual geometry, mesh, time stepping, or discretization -- when setting up the two different configurations.

Reply

Please read the discussion forum rules before posting.

Please log in to post a reply.

Note that while COMSOL employees may participate in the discussion forum, COMSOL® software users who are on-subscription should submit their questions via the Support Center for a more comprehensive response from the Technical Support team.